How to publish in JOPR

Be accepted among promi­nent con­trib­u­tors to MPOB’s Flag­ship Jour­nal of Oil Palm Research (JOPR)

How to get your arti­cles pub­lished
In order to main­tain the high stan­dards asso­ci­ated with JOPR, papers sub­mit­ted are thor­oughly scru­ti­nised on their qual­ity espe­cially in their orig­i­nal­ity, con­text and uni­ver­sal­ity of the find­ings. Of course they have to be readable.

Originality/Novelty
Orig­i­nal or novel means hav­ing some­thing new or unique to share. It is also about being dif­fer­ent, unusual and bet­ter. A sure way to cre­ate impact. In sci­ence, any rep­e­ti­tion of old meth­ods to pro­duce slightly dif­fer­ent results each time is not con­sid­ered orig­i­nal. For exam­ple, in soil stud­ies, the descrip­tion of a type of soil fol­lows a stan­dard pat­tern. If such descrip­tions are sub­mit­ted one paper at a time, the jour­nal would be flooded with low impact look-alike papers. Other areas which carry the risk of rep­e­ti­tion include species com­po­si­tion of the oil palm envi­ron­ment, algo­rithms for bio­mass esti­ma­tion, for­mu­lae for tis­sue cul­ture, and stud­ies of fer­tiliser, just to name a few. The proper place for such data is in manuals—manuals of oil palm plant­ing mate­ri­als, soil types and so on. Such rep­e­ti­tious work should be left to trained tech­ni­cians while the sci­en­tists should always focus on the inno­v­a­tive aspects of research. Every paper pub­lished should prefer­ably be at the cut­ting edge of sci­ence, or shar­ing some­thing new and exciting.

Uni­ver­sal­ity
Another yard­stick used in eval­u­at­ing sub­mit­ted papers is uni­ver­sal­ity. The find­ings must have uni­ver­sal appeal. Papers lack­ing in uni­ver­sal inter­est stand a good chance of being rejected. For exam­ple, a fer­tiliser trial car­ried out in a par­tic­u­lar local­ity on a par­tic­u­lar species. Such exper­i­ment is a clas­sic text­book fac­to­r­ial exper­i­ment, car­ried out with full sci­en­tific rigour and analysed sta­tis­ti­cally. Such a trial would take a long time to carry out, and require much organ­i­sa­tion. Nev­er­the­less, it would be in the nature of a diag­nos­tic ser­vice, like test­ing an oil palm trunk for its strength prop­er­ties, deter­min­ing the BOD con­tent of a palm oil efflu­ent from a spe­cific mill, or iden­ti­fy­ing a soil type in a cer­tain loca­tion. The find­ings are effec­tively a pre­scrip­tion for the par­tic­u­lar local­ity which can­not be extended to other local­i­ties and def­i­nitely not to the rest of the world. Such a paper should prefer­ably be pub­lished locally if at all.

Con­text
The con­text of a paper may make it suit­able for pub­li­ca­tion even if another, very similar-looking paper, may be rejected. For exam­ple, we would not wel­come papers on the ecol­ogy of algae, one algae at a time, but if a par­tic­u­lar species of algae hap­pens to hold the most poten­tial for energy gen­er­a­tion, an excep­tion would be made. A paper on soil anatomy would be wel­come if the soil is very unique, e.g. rep­re­sent­ing a pre­vi­ously unknown types.

Read­abil­ity
Every jour­nal has a par­tic­u­lar audi­ence, and a range of tech­ni­cal terms and con­cepts that its audi­ence would be used to. If a paper is writ­ten in such a way that only a chemist, phys­i­ol­o­gist, mol­e­c­u­lar biol­o­gist or econ­o­mist can under­stand, it should be sent to an appro­pri­ate jour­nal of chem­istry, phys­i­ol­ogy, mol­e­c­u­lar biol­ogy, etc. How­ever, there are cases where authors want to make their work known to an oil palm audi­ence through pub­li­ca­tion in an oil palm jour­nal. They are wel­come. To do this, they must ‘walk’ the read­ers through unfa­mil­iar terms and con­cepts. This is often not a prob­lem to authors who under­stand their topic well. They are usu­ally skilled in pre­sent­ing their spe­cial topic to non-specialist audiences.

The role of review­ers
Sci­en­tific research is a unique dis­ci­pline whereby all sci­en­tists per­form on a world stage. It is not like busi­ness or sports where one can start at vil­lage level, and move up to higher lev­els before going inter­na­tional. Any paper pub­lished in a rep­utable jour­nal imme­di­ately goes before a world audience.

The pro­fes­sion is unique also because it is a pro­fes­sional eti­quette for sci­en­tists to review papers when invited to do so by edi­tors. Review is the pri­mary mech­a­nism by which new sci­en­tists are brought up to inter­na­tional lev­els of per­for­mance. Edi­tors always try to select review­ers who have a rep­u­ta­tion in the topic to be reviewed.

The review­ers will check that the paper is of an accept­able tech­ni­cal stan­dard for that par­tic­u­lar topic. They may merely say yes or no. How­ever, review­ers and edi­tors will often go to the trou­ble of mak­ing detailed comments.

When the paper is returned to the author
If a paper has been accepted for pub­li­ca­tion, the author will usu­ally be asked to make cer­tain changes or to approve changes made by the edi­tors. At this stage, the author may nego­ti­ate with the edi­tor over the changes, or with­draw the paper. If a paper is firmly rejected by the jour­nal, the author still has the option to sub­mit it to other jour­nals. All sci­en­tists under­stand the fact that respond­ing with angry let­ters to the edi­tors and review­ers is a seri­ous breach of pro­fes­sional etiquette.

Our goal
Our goal for JOPR is to pro­mote inno­va­tion and excel­lence in the sci­ence of the oil palm and its prod­ucts. We would like to see the arti­cles impact­ing on the global audi­ence. Please help us realise this goal.

Call For Papers

Search for ARTICLE

Most cited articles


SIGN UP To JOPR MAILING LIST

Subscribe with us to get the latest information on Palm Oil Research from MPOB today!