Journal of Oil Palm Research Vol. 22  2010 December p.  887-894
Life cycle assessment for oil palm fresh fruit bunch production from continued land use for oil palm planted on mineral soil (Part 2)

Author(s): ZULKIFLI Hashim* ; HALIMAH Muhammad* ; CHAN Kok Weng* ; CHOO Yuen May* ; MOHD BASRI Wahid*

Life cycle assess­ment (LCA) is an impor­tant tool for iden­ti­fy­ing poten­tial envi­ron­men­tal impacts asso­ci­ated with the pro­duc­tion of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) from spe­cific oper­a­tions in Malaysian oil palm plan­ta­tions. This LCA study is to make avail­able the life cycle inven­tory for cradle-to-gate data so that the envi­ron­men­tal impacts posed by FFB pro­duc­tion in the plan­ta­tion can be assessed. The results of the study pro­vide the Malaysian palm oil indus­try with infor­ma­tion, and iden­tify ways and mea­sures to reduce the envi­ron­men­tal impacts.

Most of the fore­ground data were col­lected directly from the oil palm plan­ta­tions (site spe­cific) from a detailed sur­vey of the estates through­out Malaysia. The inven­tory data were col­lected from 102 plan­ta­tions (based on feed­back to a ques­tion­naire) cov­er­ing 1.1 mil­lion hectares of planted area, which is approx­i­mately 25% of the total area under oil palm. This sur­vey area con­sisted of imma­ture (1– to 2-year-old palms) and mature (3– to 25-year-old palms) areas, with both data sets included in the inven­tory for an amor­tized period of 25 years. Data gaps were filled by infor­ma­tion obtained through lit­er­a­ture and pub­lic data­bases, or cal­cu­lated using pub­lished mod­els. The inputs and out­puts from upstream activ­i­ties were quan­ti­fied on the basis of a func­tional unit of pro­duc­tion of 1 t FFB, while the life cycle impact assess­ment (LCIA) was car­ried out using the Sima Pro ver­sion 7.1 soft­ware and the Eco-indicator 99 methodology.

The weighted results of LCA for the pro­duc­tion of 1 t FFB from con­tin­ued land use (replant­ing) show sig­nif­i­cant envi­ron­men­tal impacts in the fos­sil fuels, res­pi­ra­tory inor­gan­ics and cli­mate change cat­e­gories. The most sig­nif­i­cant process con­tribut­ing to these envi­ron­men­tal impacts comes from the pro­duc­tion and usage of the var­i­ous fer­til­iz­ers (espe­cially N fer­til­iz­ers) from the use of field machin­ery (trac­tors) dur­ing oper­a­tions in the plan­ta­tion, and the use of trans­port vehi­cles bring­ing inputs to the plan­ta­tions and trans­port­ing FFB to the mills. Pro­duc­ing FFB from con­tin­ued land use (replant­ing) has no effect on land use.

The results clearly show that nitroge­nous fer­til­izer pro­duc­tion and appli­ca­tion in the plan­ta­tion is the most pol­lut­ing process in the agri­cul­tural stage of FFB pro­duc­tion; this is fol­lowed by the energy used by the machin­ery in the plan­ta­tions and for trans­porta­tion of FFB to the mills. Ways of reduc­ing the envi­ron­men­tal impacts are by increas­ing the FFB yield through the use of high-yielding oil palm plant­ing mate­ri­als which will result in increased fruit pro­duc­tion, by apply­ing more organic sources of nitro­gen fer­til­izer instead of chem­i­cal fer­til­iz­ers, by return­ing the nutrient-rich slurry from palm oil mill efflu­ent (POME) treat­ment ponds to the field, or by apply­ing com­post (empty fruit bunches + POME) as fertilizer.

Keywords: , , , ,

Author Information
* Malaysian Palm Oil Board, P. O. Box 10620, 50720 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Cited By

1. Ahmad, S., et al. "Life Cycle Inventory for Palm Based Plywood: A Gate-to-Gate Case Study". AIP Conference Proceedings 1571 (2013), pp. 569-575.
2. Ang, C. T., and N. Morad. "LCA, Ecolabelling and Carbon Footprint as Product Environmental Assessment Tool (P.E.A.T) in Malaysian Perspective." World Applied Sciences Journal 24(9) (2013): 1261-1270.
3. Choo, Y. M., et al. "Determination of GHG Contributions by Subsystems in the Oil Palm Supply Chain using the LCA Approach." International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 16(7) (2011): 669-681.
4. Fogliatti, D. P., et al. "Life Cycle Carbon Footprint of Linear Alkylbenzenesulfonate from Coconut Oil, Palm Kernel Oil, and Petroleum-Based Paraffins." ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering 2(7) (2014): 1828-1834.
5. Guilbot, J., et al. "Life Cycle Assessment of Surfactants: The Case of an Alkyl Polyglucoside used as a Self Emulsifier in Cosmetics." Green Chemistry 15(12) (2013): 3337-3354.
6. Halimah, M., et al."Determination of Life Cycle Inventory and Greenhouse Gas Emissions for a Selected Oil Palm Nursery in Malaysia: A Case Study." Journal of Oil Palm Research 25.DEC (2013): 343-347.
7. Hashim, Z., et al. "Water Footprint: Part 2 - FFB Production for Oil Palm Planted in Malaysia." Journal of Oil Palm Research 26(4) (2014): 282-291.
8. Khairuddin, N. S. K., et al. "Life Cycle Inventory for the Production of Germinated Oil Palm Seeds at a Selected Seed Production Unit in Malaysia". AIP Conference Proceedings 1571 (2013), pp. 583-588.
9. Lee, K. T., and C. Ofori-Boateng. "Environmental Sustainability Assessment of Biofuel Production from Oil Palm Biomass". Green Energy and Technology Vol 138 (2013): 149-187.
10. Ludin, N. A., et al. "Malaysian Oil Palm Plantation Sector: Exploiting Renewable Energy Toward Sustainability Production." Journal of Cleaner Production 65 (2014): 9-15.
11. Muhamad, H., et al. "Life Cycle Assessment for the Production of Oil Palm Seeds." Tropical Life Sciences Research 25(2) (2014): 41-51.
12. Puah, C. W., Y. M. Choo, and S. H. Ong. "Production of Palm Oil with Methane Avoidance at Palm Oil Mill: A Case Study of Cradle-to-Gate Life Cycle Assessment." American Journal of Applied Sciences 10(11) (2013): 1351-1355.
13. Shamim Ahmad, M., et al. "Life Cycle Assessment for Oil Palm Based Plywood: A Gate-to-Gate Case Study." American Journal of Environmental Sciences 10(1) (2014): 86-93.
14. Ng, W. J., A. A. Rahman, and S. L. Koh. "Potential of Palm Biomass as Renewable Energy Source from Data Analysis of Sua Manggis Palm Oil Mill in Linggi, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia." WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment 186 (2014): 129-138.
15. Noël, J. A., P. M. Allred, and M. A. White. "Life Cycle Assessment of Two Biologically Produced Phase Change Materials and their Related Products." International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 20(3) (2015): 367-76.
16. Awalludin, M. F., et al. "An Overview of the Oil Palm Industry in Malaysia and its Waste Utilization through Thermochemical Conversion, Specifically Via Liquefaction." Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 50 (2015): 1469-84.
17. Lim, C. I., and W. Biswas. "An Evaluation of Holistic Sustainability Assessment Framework for Palm Oil Production in Malaysia." Sustainability (Switzerland) 7(2) (2015): 16561-87.
18. Mahmud, J., et al. "The Design of Net Energy Balance Optimization Model for Crude Palm Oil Production." Communications in Computer and Information Science Vol. 516(2015):76-88.
19. Zolkarnain, N., et al. "Evaluation of Environmental Impacts and GHG of Palm Polyol Production using Life Cycle Assessment Approach." Journal of Oil Palm Research 27(2) (2015): 144-55.
20. Zolkarnain, N., et al. "Environmental Performance of Palmbased Methyl Ester Sulphonates Production using Life Cycle Approach." Journal of Oil Palm Research 28(1) (2016): 104-113
21. Marina Mior, S. N., et al. "A Preliminary Study of Knowledge, Attitude and Practices of Pesticide use among Oil Palm Workers in Johor". MATEC Web of Conferences.
22. Subramaniam, V. "Quantification of Greenhouse Gas Emissions for the Production of Crude Palm Kernel Oil - A Cradle to Gate Study." Journal of Oil Palm Research 28(3) (2016): 359-65

Source: Scopus
Last updated: 21 November 2016

Search for ARTICLE

Most cited articles


Subscribe with us to get the latest information on Palm Oil Research from MPOB today!

Indexed /Reviewed by