RESEARCH ARTICLE

Journal of Oil Palm Research Vol. 33 (2) June 2021, p. 278-288

QUANTITATIVE APPROACH FOR IRRIGATION REQUIREMENT OF OIL PALM: CASE STUDY IN CHUPING, NORTHERN MALAYSIA

MOHD SHAHKHIRAT NORIZAN*; AIMRUN WAYAYOK‡,‡‡; YAHYA ABD KARIM**; AHMAD FIKRI ABDULLAH‡,‡‡ and MUHAMMAD RAZIF MAHADI‡,‡‡

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21894/jopr.2020.0094
Received: 23 December 2019   Accepted: 7 September 2020   Published Online: 27 October 2020
ABSTRACT

The right decision is needed before the irrigation project starts because it is risky, costly and required a sitespecific approach. The study aims to estimate oil palm irrigation water demand by using FAO-CROPWAT model. Study was conducted in Chuping Region, Northern Peninsular of Malaysia. Four points were selected to represent North, East, West and South for soil sampling. The samples were sent to a laboratory to measure the water content after pressure applied at 0, 1, 10, 33 and 1500 kPa. Total available water holding capacity was found at 105-227 mm for 100 cm soil depth and the lowest value was selected to be used in FAO-CROPWAT model, developed by Land and Water Development Division of Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO). Prior to that, history of 14 years of monthly meteorological data were collected and serve as climatic data for potential evapotranspiration calculation. Based on the simulation, crop evapotranspiration (ETc) and irrigation requirement (IR) was 1175 and 255.2 mm yr–1 respectively. Total net irrigation was concluded at 132 mm yr–1 with the assumption of 80% irrigation efficiency and 5.0 mm of irrigation input. Through this study, FAO-CROPWAT found to be a suitable approach to estimate crop water requirement (CWR) for oil palm and simulate irrigation scheduling for the entire year. It can help to strategise the management plan prior to any irrigation project design and increase potential for good economic return.

KEYWORDS:

FIGURES & TABLES:

* FGV R&D Sdn Bhd, PPP Tun Razak,
27000 Jerantut, Pahang, Malaysia.
E-mail: mshahkhirat24@gmail.com

** FGV R&D Sdn Bhd,
Level 9 West, Wisma FGV Jalan Raja Laut,
50350 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

‡ Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering,
Universiti Putra Malaysia,
43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.

‡‡ Smart Farming Technology Research Center,
Level 6, Tower Block, Faculty of Engineering,
Universiti Putra Malaysia,
43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.


Allen, R G; Pereira, S L; Raes D and Smith, M (1998). Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56, PAO. DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2010.12.001.

Amirul Hadi, A; Lee, C T; Soh, K Y; Sudharsan, S; Rosman, R; Izwanizam, I and Palaniappan, S (2016). Impact of El-Nino on oil palm production. The Planter, 92(1088): 200-217.

Barzegar, A R; Mahmoodi, S H; Hamedi, F and Abdolvahabi, F (2005). Long-term sugarcane eͿects on physical properties of fine textured soils. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., : 59-68.

Bekele, S D and Tilahun, K (2009). Evaluation of the FAO CROPWAT model for deficit irrigation scheduling for onion crop in semiarid region of Ethiopia. J. Appl. Kortic., 11: 103-106. DOI: 10.37855/ jah.2009.v11i02.21.

Briggs, L J and Shantz, H L (1912). The wilting coefficient for diͿerent plants and its indirect determination. USDA, Washington. Boletim, 2S0. 83 pp.

Carlesso, R (1995). Water absorption by plants: Available versus   extractable   soil   water   and crop production. Cienc. Rural, 25(1): 183-188. DOI:10.1590/S0103-84781995000100035.

Demba, D (2014). Net irrigation requirements for maize in Isra-Nioro, Province of Kaolack (Senegal). J. Agric. Environ. Sci., S(2): 197-218. DOI: 10.15640/jaes.

Etissa, E; Dechassa, N and   Alemayehu,   Y (2016). Estimation of yield response (Ky) and validation of CropWat for tomato under diͿerent irrigation regimes. J. Irrigation and Drainage System Engineering. DOI: 10.4172/2168-9768. 1000167.

FAO (2020). CLIMWAT. http://www.fao.org/ land-water/databases-and-software/climwat-for- cropwat/en/, accessed on 16 April 2020.

Goh, K J; Chew, P S and Teo, C B (1994). Commercial yield performances of oil palms in Sabah, Malaysia. The Planter, Huala Lumpur, 0 (824): 497-507.

Henson, I E and Harun, M H (2005). The influence of climatic conditions on gas and energy exchanges above a young oil palm stand in North Kedah, Malaysia. J. Oil Palm Res., 1 : 73-91.

Isa, I; Orewole, O M and Abayomi, T A (2016). Geospatial assessment of crop water requirement for yield optimization of oil palm in South West Nigeria. Greener J. Agric. Sci., 6( ): 226-233. DOI:10.15580/ GJAS.2016.8.071316118.

Jabatan Pertanian (2008). Panduan: Mengenali Siri- siri Tanah Utama di Semenanjung Malaysia. Jabatan Pertanian Malaysia.

Kee, K K; Chew, P S; Gan, H H and Goh, K J (1998). Validation of a site yield potential model for oil palms in Malaysia. Proc. of the 1998 International Oil Palm Conference Commodity of the Past, Today and the Puture (Jatmika, A eds.). Indonesian Oil Palm Research Institute Medan, Indonesia. p. 150-163.

Kirkham, M B (2004). Chapter 10 – Field capacity, wilting point, available water and the non limiting water range. Principles of Soil and Plant Water Relations (Kirkham, M B eds.). Second edition. Academic Press, Elsevier. 154 pp. DOI:10.1016/ B978-0-12-420022-7.00010-015.

Kushairi, A; Soh, K L; Azman, I; Elina, H; Meilina, O A; Zanal, B M N I; Razmah, G; Shamala, S and Ghulam, K A P (2018). Oil palm economic performance in Malaysia and R&D progress in 2017. J. Oil Palm Res., S0(2): 163-195.

Lee, C T and Izwanizam, A (2013). Lysimeter studies and irrigation of oil palm in some inland soils of Peninsular Malaysia Felda’s experience. The Planter, Huala Lumpur, 89 (1042): 15-29.

McCarty, L B; Lewis, R H J and Virgil, Q (2016). Chapter 1: Soil physical and moisture properties. Applied Soil Physical Properties, Drainage and Irrigation Strategies (McCarty, L B; Lewis, R H J and

Virgil, Q eds.). Springer, Switzerland. p. 45-53. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24226-2.

Meijaard, E; Garcia, U J; Sheil, D; Wich, S A; Carlson, K M, JuͿe, B D and Brooks, T M (2018). Oil palm and biodiversity. A situation analysis by the IUCN oil palm task force. IUCN Oil Palm Task Porce. Gland, Switzerland. p. xiii, 116 pp.

Mohd Arif, S (2005). Oil palm planting in marginal soils: Selected cases. Oil Palm Bulletin, 50: 24-30.

MPOB (2017). Malaysian Oil Palm Statistics 2016. S6th edition. MPOB, Bangi.

MPOC (2019). Monthly palm oil trade statistic. http://mpoc.org.my/monthly-palm-oil-trade- statistics/, accessed on 23 September 2019.

Mungkalasiri, J; Wisansuwannakorn, R and Paengjuntuek, W (2015). Water footprint evaluation of oil palm fresh fruit bunches in Pathumthani and Chonburi, Thailand. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Development, 6(6): 455-459.

Muhammad Muaz, A and Marlia, M H (2014). Water footprint assessment of oil palm in Malaysia: A preliminary study. AIP Conf. Proc. 1614: 803. DOI: 10.1063/1.4895305.

Nadia, N K and Fatimah, S O (2016). Climate variability and its impact on the palm oil industry. Oil Palm Industry Economic J., 16(1): 18-30.

Ochs, R and Daniel, C (1976). Research on techniques adapted to dry regions. Oil Palm Research (Corley, R H V; Hardon, J J and Wood, B J eds.). Elsevier, Amsterdam. p. 315-330.

Palat, T; Smith, B G and Corley, R H V (2000). Irrigation of oil palm in Southern Thailand. Proc. of the Int. Planters Conf. Plantation Tree Crops in the New Millennium: The Way Ahead (Pushparajah, E eds.). Kuala Lumpur. p. 303-315.

Paramananthan, S (2012). Heys to the Identification of Malaysian Soils Using Parent Materials. Second edition. March 2012. Param Agricultural Soil Surveys (M) Sdn. Bhd.

Pocaides, A (2000). Chapter 6: Irrigation Scheduling. Technical Handbook on Pressurized Irrigation Technique. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (Pocaides, A eds.). Rome. p. 69- 78.

Raveendra, R K; Vijay, S P and Alka, U (2017). Chapter   12:    Irrigation    scheduling.    Planning and Evaluation of Irrigation Projects, Methods and Implementation (Raveendra, K R; Vijay, P S and Alka, U eds.). Elsevier. Academic Press. p. 385-412.

Reichardt, K (1988). Capacidade de campo. R. Bras. Ci. Solo, 12: 211-216.

Richards, L A (1947). Pressure-membrane apparatus construction and use. Agricultural Engineering, 28: 451-454.

Romano, S and Santini, A (2002). Water retention and storage. Methods of Soil Analysis (Dane, J H and Topp, G C eds.). Madison. Soil Science Society America. 721-738.

Shevade, V S and Loboda, T V (2019). Oil palm plantations in Peninsular Malaysia: Determinants and constraints on expansion. PLoS ONE, 14(2): e0210628. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0210628

Smith, M (1992). CROPWAT – A computer program for irrigation planning and management. Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 46. FAO.

Surendran, U; Susthanth, C M;   Mammen,   G and Joseph, E J (2015). Modelling the   crop water requirement using FAO-CROPWAT and assessment of water resources for sustainable water resource management: A case study in Palakkad District of Humid Tropical Kerala, India. Aquatic Procedia. Elsevier. p. 1211-1219. DOI: 10.1016/j. aqpro.2015.02.154.

Tailliez, B (1971). The root system of the oil palm on the San Alberto plantation in Colombia. Oléagineux, 26: 435-448.

Teh, B S C and Jamal, T (2006). Chapter 4: Water Retention. Soil Physics Analyses, Vol. 1 (Teh, B S C and Jamal, T eds.). Universiti Putra Malaysia Press. p. 14-17.

Van Lier, Q J (2002). Chapter 18: Water availability to plants. Application of soil physics in environmental analyses. Progress in Soil Sciences (Teixeira, W G; Ceddia, M B; Ottoni, M V and Donnagema, G K eds.). Springer. p. 435-452. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-06013-2.

Zulkifli, H; Halimah, M; Vijaya, S and Choo, Y M (2014). Water footprint: Part 2 – FFB production for oil palm planted in Malaysia. J. Oil Palm Res, 26(4): 282-195.